Hi ! David do your job & set the petition for hearing.

Blogg. :http://www.yapchongyee.blogspot.com
Email:yapchongyee@yahoo.com.au
Dated :

To,
M/s Lim & Hoh,
Solicitors

Dear Mr David Hoh,

Re: Lim Choi Yin -V- McLaren Saksama Sd, Bhd.

I refer to my several letters to you, contents of which I also had published on my blogg. Requesting that you openly state your present status ( as our solicitors in our application by petition for the winding up of Relionus Adjusters Sdn. Bhd), whether you are still our Solicitors; and that if you are still our solicitors, then we will appreciate it very much if you will apply to the court to set my wife’s petition down for hearing, because the Judgment of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for an order, awarded to the said 3 criminals FOR STRIKING OUT of said Petition is unenforceable for reasons that I had argued in my several letters that I sent to you and which I had published in my blogg. Copies of all my letters were always sent to the President & Secretary of the Malaysian Bar, the Hon. Attorney General of Malaysia, The Chief Judge of Malaysia and Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali.
The Order awarded to the said 3 criminals for striking out petition CANNOT BE LOGICALLY ENFORCED BECAUSE respondents have all already unconditionally accepted Rm.10,000 each as their security for costs.


The order that judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali awarded to said all 6 respondents for security for costs PRECEDED her award to the criminal Stephen Lim Cheng Ban FOR STRIKING OUT. This is the important point, that security for costs preceded order to strike out. Petitioner’s payment of Rm.60,000 was made pursuant to the order of security for costs and the order awarded by judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali TOTALLY INDUCED PETITIONER TO PAY THE SAID RM.60,000 ON THE BELIEF THATMUPON PAYMENT OF THE RM.60,000 PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO HAVE HER “DAY IN COURT”.


The Payment by Petitioner of the said Rm.60,000 has already been accepted by all 6 respondents and with the concurrence of the Presiding judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. REMEMBER also that Rm.60,000 had been accepted and put into the pockets of all the 6 respondents.

The fact that all 6 respondents & the presiding judge had all accepted the payment of Rm.60,000 without any reservations is all the reason that my wife need to put the petition down for hearing.

Therefore Mr David Hoh, WHAT ARE YOU APPEALING AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI :
(A)ARE you appealing against her order to secure the costs to the respondents of Rm.60,000; which by my opinion you cannot do because the sum has been paid in full and in time. More than that appealing against the order for security for costs ABSOLUTELY WORKS AGAINST THE INTEREST OF MY WIFE’S PETITION

OR

(B)ARE YOU APPEALING AGAINST JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI’S ORDER TO STRIKE OUT SAID PETITION ? Here again Mr David Hoh you are BLOWING IN THE WIND; THE ORDER TO STRIKE OUT IS UNENFORCEABLE; so Mr David Hoh what are you appealing against the judgment of judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali ? Is this not a case of the blind leading the blind ?

The only course that you can take is to set the petition down for hearing. The respondent Lim Cheng Ban had pleaded everything that he is likely to ever plead; and since the order to strike out is unenforceable, there is only setting down the petition for hearing.

My family will not be in Perth until the middle of November, so you have all that time to think of the issues. I had faxed to you my wife’s supporting affidavit together with my opinion why Judge Zainon’s order to strike out is unenforceable. Please proceed to apply to set the petition for hearing.


Yap Chong Yee


COPIES FAXED TO :
(a)Attorney General, Malaysia, (b)Chief Judge, Malaysia, (c)Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali (Court of Appeal, ) M/s Lim & Hoh, (Mr David Hoh, President & Secretary of Bar Council, Malaysia.


PS. Judge Zainon's ORDER TO STRIKE OUT is sheer masturbation, "SHOOTING EMPTY" all the fun and excitement is in her head alone !
Joe Yap