GALLERY OF CRIMINALS !

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI DI KUALA LUMPUR
( BAHAGIAN DAGANG )
PETISYEN PEMULA NO: D2-26-41 TAHUN 2001

Dalam perkara McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (nama lamanya) dikenali sebagai Relionus Adjusters Sdn Bhd)
Dan
Dalam Perkara Seksyen 181 Akta Syarikat, 1965
Dan
Dalam perkara Aturan 88 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi , 1980


Antara

Lim Choi Yin ...Pempetisyen

Dan

5. Lum Siew Wai (No. K/P: 4734145) ... Responden-
6. Haris Onn bin Hussein Onn (No. K/P: 661124-10-5727) Responden1. Mc Laren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
2. Wong Kem Chen (No. K/P: 500807-06-5077)
3. Stephen Lim Cheng Ban (No. K/P: 3912914)
4. Leong Yee Fook (No. K/P: 560727-10-5651)



GALLERY OF CRIMINALS

5. Lum Siew Wai (No. K/P: 4734145) ... Responden-
6. Haris Onn bin Hussein Onn (No. K/P: 661124-10-5727) Responden1. Mc Laren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
2. Wong Kem Chen (No. K/P: 500807-06-5077)
3. Stephen Lim Cheng Ban (No. K/P: 3912914)
4. Leong Yee Fook (No. K/P: 560727-10-5651)


I have so far not put my hand on HARRIS ONN bin HUSSEIN ONN, LUM SIEW WAI, and LEONG YEE FOOK, because there was no urgency to name them and what they did (other then to merely enter a formal appearance) to join in a conspiracy, with the other criminals, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon, TO OBTAIN MONEY BY FRAUD or TO OBTAIN MONEY BY FALSE PRETENCES.

In particular I like to mention that so far I missed out mentioning this HARRIS ONN bin HUSSEIN ONN fellow, not because I extend to him any special privileges because he is the son of former Malaysian Prime Minister, Tun Hussein Onn bin Jaffar Onn, and brother to current serving Malaysian Federal Minister “ whats his name bin Onn, but because my emphasis were focused on the three principal criminals Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon and their criminal actions and conduct and their probable relations to the criminal actions and conduct of those of judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali.

I want to demonstrate to HARRIS ONN bin HUSSEIN ONN, LUM SIEW WEI, LEONG YEE FOOK that they, by their participation in fraudulently and in a criminal conspiracy and freely agreeing to participate in a criminal joint venture, SUBSCRIBED TO JOINTLY APPLYING FOR COURT COSTS (relating to the trial of the above petition) BY FALSELY ALLEGING THAT THEY WILL SUFFER MONETARY LOSS IN THE WAY OF COURT COSTS, IF THE PETITION WAS ALLOWED TO GO TO TRIAL; while fully knowing that by the facts pleaded by both the Petitioner & Respondents, Stephen Lim, Kwong Sea Yoon and Wong Kem Chen, the pleadings will reveal that there was no likelihood that they will incur court costs by their participation, and more appropriately NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE DEFENCE OF THE PETITION, WHICH IN FACT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM.. It was open to their solicitors to assess by the state of the pleadings that they were not in any way exposed to any court costs whatsoever; even if they had not entered any appearance to the service of the petition on them as formal respondents.

The respondents Leong Yee Fook, Lum Siew Wei, and Harris Onn bin Hussein Onn are therefore, by their knowledge of the facts & pleadings are deemed to have constructive knowledge that they were not at all threatened by any likely court costs if the petition went to trial. I believe that this Harris Onn fellow is a LAWYER, therefore he should have known better.

Let me spell it out for these three patsy, that they, by the afore-mentioned facts, HAVE COMMITTED THE CRIMINAL OFFENCES OF OBTAINING MONEY BY FALSE PRETENCES OR WORST FOR PERPETRATING THE CRIME OF OBTAINING MONEY BY FRAUD; and depending on the facts that will be reveal in cross examination, they may face possible conspiracy charges to addd to the others. All these criminal offences carry a term of several years in jail. It was obvious to all in that criminal conspiracy (including judge Zainon binti Mohd Ali) that their criminal common purpose was to”BUMP UP” the seize of the SECURITY FOR COSTS so that my wife will not be able to find the money to progress the petition; but they reckoned wrong. My two daughters loan the amount at yearly interest of 30% compound interest, Y_O_Y(year on year. I take this opportunity to inform these suckers that actions to recover DAMAGES FOR OBTAINING MONEY BY FRAUD and such like courses of actions will be taken when the time is RIGHT. On the basis of having taken RM.10,000 each and if by the beard of Allah the court awards damages as claimed, they will each have to pay damages to my wife of at least RM.45,000 for holding the “security for costs” over a period of 10 years; add to that they will have to pay court costs INTERESTS ACCRUING FOR THE WHOLE OF THE PERIOD, and add general damages to that sum. We will be laughing all the way to the bank. The fact that judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali perverted the course of justice to benefit these several criminals DID THEM A LOT OF HARM.

On top of those monetary losses, they face a likely term of imprisonment. ALL UP I DON’T THINK IT WAS WORTH STICKING UP FOR EACH OTHER LIKE THIEVES.

I WILL COME TO THE PART THAT JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD ALI CONTRIBUTES TO THIS BIZARRE COMEDY OF THE NINCOMPOOPS, IN A LATER POSTS. WATCH THIS SPACE.