Malaysians Unplugged Uncensored: September 2007

THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR OF COURT OF APPEAL JUDGE DATO ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI OF MALAYSIAPLEASE HAND THIS FAX-EMAIL TO YOUR PROFESSOR OR LECTURER IN CRIMINAL LAW, OR CIVIL PROCEDURE, PROSECUTORS OF MALAYSIA, JUDGES & MAGISTRATES & MEDIA, DEAN LAW SCHOOL, UNI. SINGAPORE, UNI. OF MALAYSIA, UNI OF WA. UNI. OF SYDNEY.
FROM,YAP CHONG YEE, 5a Prinsep Road, Attadale, 6156, Perth, http://yapchongyee.blogspot.comTO,Tan Seri ZAKI, PRESIDENT of COURT OF APPEAL,(CHIEF JUSTICE DESIGNATE) Re: Re : Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ; Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd
Gretings Tan Seri Zaki, I have written to you on many occassions but received no response. However it is more imporatant for me and all the unfortunate Malaysians to read the truth that Malaysia is Lawless. Consider the fact that it is found formally by the Royal commission inquiring the Lingam Types and found that Mahatir, Lingam and Vincent Tan have been formally declared by the Royal Commission to have been culpable for perverting and abusing the process of appointing Judges and no fucking action has been taken according to Law ? How do you account for the fact that it has been openly disclosed in Parliament by Mr Lim Kit Siang that A-G Patail Gani had abused his powers by with holding information that will clear Dato Sri Anwar from criminal charges ? To cut a very long story, short. I have written many times complaining of the abuse by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of her judicial powers, and I did not receive even an acknowlegement ? Which Judiciary in the modern world that finds the GOVERNMENT pro-actively connives at the criminal behaviour of Judges at the most senior level of their judiciary ? Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali pro-actively participated in a conspiracy to fabricate evidence and to pro-actively aid and abet the respondents to commit PERJURY & FORGERY; and the irony and joke on Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is that SHE DOES NOT KNOW SUFFICIENT PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW to make an acceptable case for striking out. Her actions vis a vis the striking out of my wife's petition IN LAW DID NOT AND COULD NOT ACHIEVE THE EFFECT OF VOIDING MY WIFE'S CAUSE OF ACTION AS FRAMED IN HER PETITION. In short my wife's petition IN LAW IS STILL ACTIVE. It is only the abuse of power by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian judiciary that "HANGS" my wife's petition in a stae of suspended animation. It is obvious that Judge Dato Zainon, through her ignorance of the LAW believes that her Order to strike out is within her discretionary powers, but it is just as easily proven that she does not know the LAW and is ignorant that her actions FUCKING CONSTITUTES ABUSE OF HER JUDICIAL POWERS. I am convinced that my wife's petition will be either destroyed or go missing to hide the criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon. It is just relevant at this point to mention that according to the circumstances that arose from Judge Zainon approving 2 fucking conflicting & opposing orders simultaneously, that turned her ORDER TO STRIKE OUT INTO CRIMINAL ACTION;and it is obvious too that Judge Zainon thinks that her actions are merely "procedural & a matter of judicial discretion, BUT SHE IS FUCKING WRONG AS I WILL SPELL IT OUT. Her ORDER to award Security for costs of Rm.60,000 fucking turned into a fully executed contract upon receipt by Respondents of my wife's tender of her Rm.60,000 in complaince to Zainon's ORDER TO PROVIDE SECURITY FOR COSTS, on the following basis : (a)Petitioner (my wife) paid her Rm.60,000 to respondents, on the EXPECTATION that the law will be observed and that Judge Zainon will set Petition down for trial, and respondents agree that a trial of Petition will follow as a matter of course (b)Respondents accepted and received Rm.60,000 knowing that in LAW they will have to answer to Petitioner's claims in the trial of the petition as a matter of course. The payment of the security for costs IS THE CONSIDERATION THAT CRYSTALIZED the contractual OBLIGATIONS of the Respondents vs. Petitioner. Judge Zainon has no powers whatsoever to FUCKING VOID this contract that has arisen from her order for security for costs. IT IS AT THIS POINT THAT THE OBLIGATION OF JUDGE ZAINON UNDER THIS DE FACTO CONTRACT TURNED HER ACTION AND CONDUCT INTO ACTIONS AND CONDUCT THAT ARE CRIMINAL. Judge Zainon at this pointt is duty bound by LAW and by this de facto contract to set this Petition for trial; and her unlawful and illigal actions and conduct to REFUSE TO HOLD A HEARING ON THE MERITS OF SAID PETITION CONSTITUTES FUCKING MALFEASANCE. The CRIME of Malfeasance is committed by a public servant who refuses to do his duty as reqired BY LAW that he/she requires that she executes his/her duty. JUDGE ZAINON HAS NO POWERS JUDICIAL OR OTHERWISE TO VOID THIS DE FECTO CONTRACT, therefore, she is bound by law to do her duty to TRY THIS PETITION which she has refused to carry out; AND THEREFORE SHE HAS COMMITTED THE CRIME OF MALFEASANCE WHICH IS FUCKING BOTH A CRIME AND A TORT !. HOW CAN THE HIGHEST COURT IN MALAYSIA ACCEPT AND PERPETRATE SUCH A JOKE AND MOCKERY OF MALAYSIA'S LEGAL & JUDICIAL SYSTEMS ? MALAYSIA is an unmitigated joke to posture the pretentions of a modern and developed nation by 2020. A banana KINDA MONARCHY IS MORE YOUR SPEED. Malaysia where English is not spoken and less understood by 80% of those who claim to be literate, IS BETTER OFF BY HAVING THE ADAT PEPERTEH OR THE SYRIAH AS YOUR LEGAL SYSTEM; at least then your judges will understand what the law is. English Common Law as practised in Malaysia is not English Common Law at all because 80% of your Judges and Lawyers do not understand what ever is written in English, much less understand what is written in JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS PRONOUNCED IN CASE LAWS. It is for this reason that Malay judges do not write JUDGMENTS, they cannot articulate their thoughts. This is a declaration to the dismal lack of professional integrity and competence of one of your most senior Judges Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. CONSIDER THE FULL IMPACT OF HER APPROVAL OF TWO FUCKING RIDICULOUS ORDERS OF (1) Order for security for costs of Rm.60,000 and AFTER MY WIFE HAD PAID THE Rm.60,000, and respondents had accepted the Rm.60,000, Judge Zainon WENT ON TO APPROVE (2) ORDER TO STRIKE OUT AFTER RESPONDENTS HAD ACCEPTED & RECEIVED RM.60,000. Even an Idiot and an illiterate will know that the effect of two directly opposing court orders acting against each other amounts to fucking ZERO OR FUCKING NOTHING. Having said that the retention of My wife's security for costs of Rm.60,000 under Judge Zainon's order becomes a CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF RETAINING STOLEN MONEY OBTAINED UNDER FALSE PRETENCES, BECAUSE that security for costs was accepted, and then trial was denied by Zainon's order to strike out. The sequence of events order for security, acceptance of Rm.60,000, then followed by Order to strike out shows that Zainon did not intend to set the petition for trial as she is supposed to by LAW. This sequence of events will be sufficient to convict Judge Zainon Binti Mohd. Ali for AIDING & ABETTING RESPONDENTS TO OBTAIN MONEY UNDER FALSE PRETENCES.
Malaysians Unplugged Uncensored: September 2007