DAVID NOT TO ACCEPT RETURN OF RM.60,OOO SECURITY FOR COSTS

Yap Chong Yee
Dated : 18 Dec., 2007
To,
Mr David Hoh,
M/s Lim & Hoh,
Solicitors,

Dear Mr David Hoh,


Re :KL High Court Originating Petition No. : D2-26-41-2001
Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & 5 others.

I had earlier (some months ago, refer letter published in my blog) given instructions to you that you are not to accept if offered by the respondents (all 6 of them or any of them) the REFUND or the return of the RM60,000 paid by petitioner (my wife) to M/s Mathews, solicitors for 1st respondent company, to be held by M/s Mathews & Co. in trust for all the 6 respondents as security for costs. My wife paid this RM.60,000 in compliance with Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s court order that was in fact drawn up by her (Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali) and amended by her (another judicial nonsense unprecedented in all of Anglo-American jurisdictions, evidence of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali pro-actively participated in the conspiracy to obtain money by false pretences ).

I had instructed you not to accept the RM.60,000 EXCEPT IF ORDERED TO ACCEPT BY COURT ORDER. I warn you not to accept this RM>60,000 because the payment and acceptance by the respondents CONSTITUTES THE FULL ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI’S ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS. You are hereby instructed that YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THE REFUND OR RETURN OF THE RM.60,000. If you think you can unilaterally change the nature of our retainer from one that gives you 30% of all that is recovered from the respondents to one that gives you “quantum meruit “ thereby conferring on you a right to take out of the “refunded” RM.60,000 and implicit legal right to accept said RM>60,000; then you will be wrong. Let it be known that if you think that you can contrive to “FASHION” a legal right in this manner, then be warned that I believe that you will be liable to prosecution for CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. You cannot grab my wife’s money in your hand, by accepting the return of the RM.60,000 and say that we owe you on a “qantum meruit” such & such amount, therefore you claim the right to “take out what you think is a sum equal to such quantum meruit”. TAKE NOTICE THAT IF YOU THINK WE OWE YOU, THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO SUE FOR IT.

To cut a long story short, I want the RM.60,000 to remain where it is; IT WILL BE MY SHOWCASE TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE WORLD THAT THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY IS INCOMPETANT, AND CRIMINAL. That RM.60,000 IS FOR FUCKING SECURITY FOR COSTS AND SINCE THERE IS NO TRIAL, RESPONDENTS CANNOT LAY THEIR HANDS ON IT. Let the RM.60,000 rot in the hands of all the co-conspirators; there is the firm of Mathews & Co. acting for Kwong Sea Yoon (secretary for 1st respondent) and who ran away when my wife applied to cross examine him for PERJURY, there is the firm of Annad & Noraini, solicitors for Stephen Lim Cheng Ban & Wong Kem Chen, and who committed SUBORNATION OF FORGERY & PERJURY and then there is that “mudhead Malaysian Federal Court Judge, Zainon binti Mohd. Ali; who committed aiding & abetting the criminals to commit PERJURY & FORGERY; co-conspirator to the perverting of the course of justice and co-conspirator to the BLOCKING OF A POLICE INVESTIGATION; and several related criminal offences for fraud.

Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, having ENFORCED HER OWN ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS abused her judicial powers when she with full personal knowledge that she had ENFORCED HER OWN ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS, go on to further award to Stephen Lim Cheng Ban his application for striking out said petition, BECAUSE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI FUCKING KNOWS THAT STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN DOES NOT COME TO EQUITY WITH CLAEN HANDS. The normal re-course for STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN IS FUCKING APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS; and not go on to fucking file another INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT WHEN THE ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS HAS BEEN FUCKING ENFORCED BY THE FUCKING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI.

David Hoh leave the RM.60,000 where it belongs under the order for security for costs. I love to see how that “mudhead Malaysian Federal Court Judge, Zainon binti Mohd. Ali solve this issue.

HEY ! FUCKING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI Mohd. Ali, do what the law requires you to do, which is to order the fucking investigation of the 3 police reports filed by my wife and me charging the 3 criminals Stephen Lim Cheng ban, Kwong Sea Yoon & Wong Kem Chen BECAUSE IF THE POLICE INVESTIGATION ABSOLVES THE 3 CRIMINALS FROM BREACH OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, then you can definitely win, in an Australian Court MY EXTRADICTION !

JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI, ALSO PRESIDENT OF THE MALAYSIAN COURT OF APPEAL & MALAYSIAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILL IT NOT BE SWEET REVENGE FOR YOU MALAYSIANS TO PUT ME IN JAIL FOR FUCKING MAKING A FALSE POLICE REPORT & FOR LIBEL ?

There you fucking have it, YOU EITHER PROSECUTE THE 3 CRIMINALS FOR THEIR BREACHES OF THE PENAL CODE OR YOU FUCKING PROSECUTE ME,YAPCHONGYEE FOR MAKING FALSE POLICE REPORTS.

The Malaysian Law says that under the circumstances, YOU EITHER PROSECUTE THE 3 CRIMINALS OR YOU PROSECUTE ME; there is no choice in the matter, EXCEPT THAT IF YOU DO NOTHING THEN AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID FUCKING MALAYSIA IS FUCKING LAWLESS !

Copy:
(1)President of Malaysian Court of Appeal, (2)Federal Court Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali (3)President & Secretary Malaysian Bar Council(4)Malaysian A.-G