CONVICTION OF JUDGE ZAINON IS OPEN AND SHUT BASED ON THREE FACTS

NEW CHIEF JUSTICE VOWS TO PUNISH ERRANT JUDGES !
FROM,YAP CHONG YEE, 5a Prinsep Road, Attadale, 6156, Perth, http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com/TO,Tan Seri ZAKI, PRESIDENT of COURT OF APPEAL,(CHIEF JUSTICE DESIGNATE) Re: Re : Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ; Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd
"Newly-appointed Chief Justice Zaki Azmi has pledged to act against a “small” number of judges who have failed to perform their duties."
This above quotation is taken from Malaysikini, IS THIS TRUE OR IS IT MERE SPEECH MAKING FOR THE SAKE OF SAYING SOMETHING TO SAY. If Tan Seri Zaki Azmi is serious then, what is more obvious than to scrutinize my wife's petition as set out above O.Petition No. D2-26-41 of 2001 Lim Choi Yin v. Mclarens etc.
Here is a clear case of Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali's ABUSE OF POWER. This is a case that is open and shut or black and white; no contest as to the facts that is required to prove our case that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali abused her judicial powers. What are the facts, pray tell ? They are (1)she approved ORDER for security for costs and upon payment by my wife of Rm.60,000 as security for costs Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali went on further to approve (2) ORDER TO STRIKE OUT.
The combination of these 3 facts, order for security for costs plus payment of Rm.60,000 while the order for security for costs IS STILL ACTIVE (no ORDER to set aside ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS); crystalized into a binding AGREEMENT between Respondents, Petitioner and Judge Zainon THAT UPON PAYMENT OF SECURITY FOR COSTS (RM.60,000) JUDGE ZAINON WILL SET THE PETITION FOR TRIAL. This de facto AGREEMENT IS ONE THAT COMPLIES WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF A EXECUTED CONTRACT BECAUSE PETITIONER HAD GIVEN FULL CONSIDERATION TO CONCLUDE HER SIDE OF THE AGREEMENT (RM.60,000); THEREFORE THE OBLIGATION IS ON JUDGE ZAINON TO ABIDE BY THIS AGREEMENT. That judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali HAD ADAMANTLY REFUSED TO SET THE PETITION DOWN FOR TRIAL CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF HER OBLIGATION OF OFFICE GIVEN BY HER UNDER OATH UPON ACCEPTING HER APPOINTMENT TO THE HIGH COURT BENCH. Her refusal to perform her duty therefore constitutes MALFEASANCE (the crime of not performing her duty as required by LAW.
Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali abused her judicial powers because she APPROVED THE APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PETITION, KNOWING THAT THERE EXIST IN PLACE AN AGREEMENT BINDING ON RESPONDENTS AND PETITIONER ALIKE, that upon payment of security for costs (Rm.60,000), a fact which Judge Zainon knew since it was she who personally wrote the terms of the Order for the payment of security for costs; in these circumstances, as a judge of the High Court, Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali KNOWS THAT IF SAID PETITION IS STRUCK OFF, PETITIONER CANNOT PROCEED ANY FURTHER FOR AS LONG AS 20 YEARS OR MORE, long after the death of petitioner.
I ask Tan Seri Zaki Azmi to take notice that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, had PERSONALLY written out the TERMS of the payment of the security for costs; AND SHE INSTRUCTED THAT RM.60,000 BE PAID INTO THE HANDS OF RESPONDENTS AND NOT INTO THE TREASURY of THE HIGH COURT IN KL. Effectively, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali's terms of payment would have CAUSED PETITIONER TO LOSE HER RM.60,000, and for the Respondents to unlawfull and illegally retained the said security for costs. I charge Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for committing the crime of obtaining money under false pretences, in CONSPIRACY WITH THE RESPONDENTS. There are seceral criminal charges that I will pursue later such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.