WHO WILL INVESTIGATE & PROSECUTE NAJIB & WIFE ?

The fact that neither Najib nor his wife sued R P Kamaruddin for criminal defamation and that the suits for these actions for defamation were in fact pursued by the ADC to Najib’s wife and the other two colonels is indictment enough that Najib & wife have something to hide. Just as this Syed Albar, the PM himself and other UMNO stalwarts claim that if Anwar is innocent then why does he not give up his DNA ? Same question put to Syed Albar, PM and others.

RPK clearly cited chapter and verse what he believed and had knowledge that Najib & wife are implicated as active participants; and RPK’s intention is for Najib & wife to sue him for damages, so that evidence that RPK claims he has in his possession can be tendered in his defense. There is no doubt that Najib & wife have been properly advised not to meet face to face with RPK or the whole issue will be put to public scrutiny. There is no doubt that Najib & wife has decided not to risk this disaster; hence I point my finger at Najib and say, IF YOU AND YOUR WIFE ARE INNOCENT OF THE CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT ARE LEVELLED AT YOU THEN WHY DO YOU NOT TRY TO CLEAR YOUR NAMES ?

The truth about the administration of law and justice in Malaysia is totally missing, senior judges at the highest level of the Malaysian judiciary have no idea of the limits of their powers and in most cases they abuse their powers with impunity without the slightest flicker of regret or indeed the slightest tinge of shame that as the trustee of the power of the state they have a moral duty to exercise their power with the proper limits of responsible restraint. In Malaysia some of the most senior judges of the court of appeal have in their ignorance of the law or more likely careless of their oath of office have openly committed criminal offences while adjudicating on the bench of the Malaysian High Court.

I have an active case to cite for all the world to know that such ignorance of the Malaysian law is not uncommon and as a matter of fact occurs quite often. My wife’s case is an example :

Re :KL High Court Originating Petition No. : D2-26-41-2001
Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & 5 others.

There are many embarrassments that Judge Zainon binti Mohd Ali the presiding judge at the hearing of my wife’s petition committed and arising from her adjudication of my wife’s petition. I just need to cite one such embarrassments for the sake of brevity. Can you believe me when I tell you that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had first approved respondents’ application for security for costs imposed on my wife for the sum of Rm. 60,000 and AFTER MY WIFE HAD PAID THE RM.60,000, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI PROCEEDED TO SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED A 2ND APPLICATION FROM THE RESPONDENTS FOR AN ORDER TO STRIKE OUT MY WIFE’S PETITION.

The NONSENSE that pass for 2 opposing court orders as ordered by judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is indication of the level of of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s knowledge of the law; and judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is now sitting as SENIOR JUDGE,ON THE BENCH OF THE MALAYSIAN COURT OF APPEAL.

I will openly state my analysis why judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had committed several criminal offences just by approving these 2 opposing court orders to the same respondents. Her award for security for costs in the sum of RM60,000, she personally directed payment to the respondents’ solicitors M/s Mathews & Co. to hold as stake holder for all the 6 respondents; and that being the case Mathews & Co. holds my wife’s Rm.60,000 as trustees for all 6 respondents AND FOR THE STATED PURPOSE OF DISBURSING TO RESPONDENTS THEIR COSTS ASSESSED ON AN APPROVED BILL OF COSTS; and for that stated purposes alone. Mathews cannot disburse this Rm.60,000 in any other way or they will be held responsible committing CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST.

My wife had through my daughter, instructed M/slim & Hoh of Jln. Bukit Nanas, KL her solicitors (we still do not know if they are our solicitors because they have not responded to our many letters on this matter.) TO WITHDRAW THAT NONSENSE APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT. This effectively raise the legality of that nonsense order FOR STRIKING OUT PETITION made by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali; because by putting an end to all proceedings by our withdrawal of that nonsense appeal, we have FREED THE RM.60,000 SECURITY FOR COSTS AND WE DARE MATHEWS & CO. TO DISBURSE THAT SUM TO ALL THE RESPONDS AS COSTS. If they take the money as they are likely to think they are entitled to do so under that order for striking our said petition; but they have first to reconcile the fact that NO TRIAL EVER TOOK PLACE THEREFORE THERE IS NO COSTS THAT CAN BE TAXED !

I dearly like to see what Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and the respondents will do. HOWEVER, I PROMISE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI THAT I WILL COME TO KL TO SQUARE THINGS WITH HER AND THOSE CROOKS.