THE DISAPPEARANCE OF BALA

From my own experience dealing with the Malaysian police, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian Court of Appeal, I can only say to Bala that what he has done is what I would have done if I were in his shoes. The police of Malaysia has absolutely no credibility and so is the Malaysian Judiciary from my experience dealing with Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, who is one of the most senior judges in the country as I will recount.

I am sure that Bala had been forced into retracting his criminal charges that he had made accusing Deputy PM Najib in his first Statutory declaration, of facts which he alleges he knows first hand and therefore are admissible evidence because from my appreciation of the facts that Deputy PM Najib has to face in a criminal prosecution can only become admissible if they are put into proper perspective BY THE EVIDENCE OF BALA; and therefore without the statements from Bala to “open the door” for introducing evidence that are made against DPM Najib & his wife, implicating them in the murder of Altantula, NO EVIDENCE CAN LINKED DPM NAJIB & WIFE. Without the evidence of Bala all the allegations that are made against DPM & wife are merely hearsay.

Has Bala been bribed or threatened to an inch of his life ? There is a lot of speculation and a lot has been written in the Malaysian blogs, BUT WHAT THEY MISSED IS THE CRUCIAL LINK TO THE DISAPPEARANCE, BY FAIR MEANS OR FOUL, the case against against DPM Najib & wife has gone with the disappearance of BALA. The right question for the Malaysian bloggers to ask is WHY DID BALA RETRACT HIS STATEMENTS AGAINST NAJIB JUST HOURS AFTER HE MADE HIS FIRST STATEMENT ? Was he paid to disappear ? I certainly think so. This is how the Malaysian system works. The police & judiciary just have too much contempt for their own Malaysian laws to care what the probable consequences are; so far as they are concerned there is no law that applies to them. THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW.

In my wife’s case our respondents had perjured & forged documents, but when we applied to cross examine their deponents, my wife was denied leave to cross examine the respondent who affirmed the statements. WHAT IS MOST DISGRACEFUL IS THE UTTER INCOMPETANCE OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI; she did not even appreciate THAT THE DAMNED RESPONDENTS HAD IN FACT FILED A DEFENCE; and yet Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali struck out my wife’s petition on the grounds that her petition showed no cause of action.

Can you imagine this situation, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had asked our counsel Mr David Hoh to ask my wife to withdraw my wife’s application to cross examine and when we refused her request to withdraw, she went on a continous course of postponements, lasting over 4 years; and then later our counsel Mr David Hoh recommended to us that the judge’s constant postponements was a message to us that she wants us to withdraw. Mr David recommended that we clear the decks (so to speak) so that we can go on with the hearing. We did that and immediately Respondents filed an application for striking out, for showing no cause of action. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali approved the striking out; and in spite of the fact that my wife had already paid Rm. 60,000 for security for costs. THAT RM. 60,000 IS STILL IN THE HANDS OF RESPONDENTS’ SOLICITORS, BECAUSE I HAVE SAID THAT THEY WITH THE COMPLICITY OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI CONSPIRED TO OBTAIN MONEY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES. It is already now 8 years that they have taken the Rm. 60,000 and they have not got the guts to distribute the money. OUR RM. 60,000 ARE STILL IN THEIR POCKETS AND THEY DARE NOT SPEND IT.

I am coming to KL to sue this judge after the Beijing Olympics, and hopefully there is a change of government and a new Attorney General in place by that time.

My address is 5a Prinsep Road, Attadale, W. Aust. 6156
Blog : http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com
yapchongyee@Gmail.com